data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/051c6/051c684c997821ab73a7b3ee7d18f2a4766e29fe" alt=""
One local blogger at The Education Optimist has tackled this with gusto and if you care about the issue, I urge you to read her posts. Media coverage has been until very recently entirely one-sided and I'm glad to have this side of the issue articulated so clearly by but the current situation with regard to need-based financial aid is unspeakably bad — a disgrace to this university, as the graphic shows. Faculty and staff are contributing now to a big campaign for need-based aid but even a real success there won't be more than a drop in the bucket.
The only real answer, it seems clear, is massive increases in public support for higher education. In a sense, this initiative might be one shot at keeping the place from collapsing until we can address the fundamental issues. And we have to do that.
*I should mention that I'm in close agreement with her on any number of other issues, like this, and have now started reading that blog regularly.
2 comments:
Like you say, the Initiative doesn't address the underlying problems. I guess I might vote for it if it was a voting situation, but in the end, even if it's handled and developed well, it might not matter much: a band-aid can be a good thing to put on, but you should know that it's just a band-aid when you put it on.
Thanks for pointing this out.
One question, any chance of showing the same graphic with the cost of tuition next to the financial aid?
I read a few more of the link's comments on this topic, particularly on the whole high-tuition, high-aid model. Very helpful comments.
But I'm left wondering how to tell whether a school is trying to play with the private schools or just get out of the basement in both tuition and aid.
Post a Comment